BOS
SaaS Development Agency · Boston

Deep-tech buyers,
technical sprint partner.

Boston buyers are usually technical — PhDs, engineering CTOs, MIT/Harvard ops people. They want architecture diagrams, not pitch decks. Our sprints suit that profile: every deliverable comes with the technical rationale (typed schemas, decision logs, written architecture). HIPAA awareness for biotech, FERPA awareness for edtech, source files on delivery — built for technical buyers who can read what they're buying.

Boston · Massachusetts
Fixed price · no surprises
Eastern (EST/EDT)
Async-first · no mandatory calls
Source files on delivery
50/50 payment · milestones
Boston · Massachusetts
Fixed price · no surprises
Eastern (EST/EDT)
Async-first · no mandatory calls
Source files on delivery
50/50 payment · milestones
Why Boston

What's local about this engagement.

Real considerations for founders shipping out of Boston — tax-credit math, regulatory awareness, time-zone alignment, talent ecosystem.

01 ——

Technical-buyer-friendly delivery

Boston founders and technical buyers want the architecture diagram, the typed schemas, the decision-log rationale — not a pitch deck. Every Amatrix Studio sprint includes a written architecture document, schema definitions, and a decision log explaining the trade-offs taken. The kind of documentation a PhD-CTO can audit before signing the next sprint.

02 ——

HIPAA-aware delivery for biotech / digital health

Boston biotech and digital-health founders deal with PHI — HIPAA Privacy Rule, HIPAA Security Rule, BAA contracts with covered entities. We're not a Business Associate by default, but we ship architectures that pass HIPAA technical-safeguard audits: encryption at rest and in transit, role-based access controls, audit-log structures, segregation of duties hooks, BAA-ready data flows.

03 ——

FERPA-aware for edtech

Boston edtech (MIT/Harvard alumni density) deals with student records under FERPA. We ship aware of the educational-records exception structure, parental consent flows for K-12, and direct-eligible-student access for post-secondary. Not legal advice — your counsel owns FERPA — but architecturally, we don't ship products that fight the regulation.

04 ——

MIT/Harvard pipeline talent context

We don't poach your engineering team — but we're aware of the talent market. If your sprint hands off to an MIT-spinout in-house team, our deliverables (typed contracts, written rationale, full source files) match the documentation standard your engineers expect. No gluework needed to bring it in-house.

Tax credits stacked
  • Section 174 R&D capitalization (federal)
  • MA Life Sciences tax credits (varies by program eligibility)
Industries served
  • Biotech / digital health (HIPAA-aware)
  • Edtech (FERPA-aware)
  • B2B SaaS (Boston has more than people think)
  • Deep-tech / hardware-software
  • Climate tech
Time zone
Eastern (EST/EDT)
Same time zone as MTL HQ. Async cycle has zero offset; specs by EOD land at SOD next.
Travel from MTL HQ
1h flight or 5h drive from MTL HQ. Onsite kickoffs feasible.
Boston-specific questions

Before you commit.

Are you HIPAA-compliant?

We are HIPAA-aware, not HIPAA-certified. Distinction matters. We don't sign Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) by default — we're not handling PHI in our normal sprint workflow. What we do: ship architectures that pass HIPAA technical-safeguards audits when your in-house team or downstream BA-cleared vendor takes over. Encryption, access controls, audit logs, segregation of duties, BAA-ready data interfaces. If your sprint requires us to handle PHI directly (rare), we'll discuss BAA terms and cost separately.

Can you support an FDA Software-as-a-Medical-Device (SaMD) submission?

Adjacent, not directly. We ship the working software and the architecture/decision documentation that becomes part of your Design History File. We don't run the formal verification & validation cycles that an FDA-regulated medical device submission requires — that's a regulated-software specialty firm's domain (typically $200K–$500K just for the V&V). What we ship is the pre-V&V architecture: the documentation foundation that makes the V&V firm's job 6 months faster instead of 12.

How do you handle the technical-buyer profile typical of Boston?

Every sprint deliverable includes an architecture decision document and typed schema definitions in the source. For Boston engagements specifically — where the buyer is usually technical and will audit the work themselves — we lead the kickoff with the architecture trade-offs we'd recommend, get written sign-off on the chosen path, and document deviations in the decision log. Pitch-deck theater wastes our time and yours; we skip it.

Does Amatrix Studio serve clients outside Boston?

Yes. We are async-first by default — every engagement runs identically whether you're in Boston, MTL, Toronto, NYC, or anywhere else in North America. The Boston-specific advantages above (local tax credits, industry awareness, time-zone alignment) are bonuses for Boston founders, not constraints on who we'll work with.

What does a typical first engagement look like?

Most Boston founders start with an Ideation Sprint ($4,995, 1 week) or HTML Demo Sprint ($9,995, 3–4 weeks) before committing to a Full Stack build. The smaller sprint validates fit and credit applies to your next sprint within 60 days. No retainers, no minimum spend.

Ready to start a sprint?

Tell us what you're building. We'll confirm the sprint tier, timeline, and price in writing — usually within 24 hours.

Start a sprint → amatrix.studio/contact